A draft BIM Mandate for Infrastructure has already been issued for public comment in QLD, Will the result of this mandate be, If you have BIM you’re in, if not, then you’re out? A2K have been talking to the legal teams that write the policies for BIM Mandates for some time, we are all watching intensely how QLD’s mandate unfolds. Only at last month at MelBIM, a representative from the Victorian Government stated they are closely watching the development of BIM and working through policies and framework for implementation. The changes are getting closer, it’s now a decision for all involved in the Construction Industry as to whether BIM will be a Tsunami of damage or a floodgate of opportunity!
It is interesting comparing the output of Bridge design drawings to Building Structures. I can see how BIM will work for Infrastructure. Is it that BIM for infrastructure is a natural fit knowing the higher degree of accuracy required vs those of the building group tolerances? Buildings have managed to negate responsibility on the set-out, rebar placement and so on, Bridges have dimensions on their drawings. There is a higher standard in the detailing, and everything needs to physically fit, not something that the Shop Detailer will get to work! And is it that the structural component that needs to be managed after construction (FM) the reason why BIM works for infrastructure? There are many reasons as to why this makes sense.
I can just see some of the Buildings peeps fuming now, but when you start producing a concrete set-out plan, we can talk more about BIM responsibility.
Revit can model bridges.
Our Clients are preparing, they are listening to our advice and the advice of their BIM Managers. Training for staff is planned, where some are providing base knowledge for Revit users, the implementation of others is to establish a strong workforce in one of the key offices. Both methods have initiated a Revit (BIM) champion. This enables the Company to have a voice to constructively challenge A2K because our job is not to lead a team constantly, good training enables the team to become self-sufficient.
What are your options moving forward?
When we initially consult with Companies transitioning into BIM, the questions we ask are:
- What are you trying to achieve?
- Highly competitive BIM production?
- Entry level of BIM?
- How many staff do you want to transition?
- Transitioning staff, is it all at once or in groups?
- How are engineers being shown this transition
- What is the advantage for a PM and managers to understand this?
- Do you have established documented standards?
- Then, how do we get the best success for your company with the budgeted amount!
- What needs to be modelled vs detailed?
- Weigh up level of effort vs level of return (it’s easy to get lost in the 3D show)
The transition to BIM is not purchasing the software, it’s the Intellectual Property (IP) that a Company puts into it. If your Company sources all the IP entirely themselves and gleans the internet for as much as they can, there is no problem with that, just be aware that it takes time, no really, or if your Company would like to be trained then guided by A2K, utilising our greater experiences that we have had with Nationally and Overseas, either way, careful planning is required. Ultimately, this is a serious business decision, but a necessary one.
Give it the time and diligence it deserves, so that it may serve your Company well.
Fair winds and following seas,